Wednesday, February 27, 2013
The Property Rights Newsletter March 1, 2013 - Issue #702 "Is freedom anything else than the right to live as we wish? Nothing else."- Epictetus |
![]() ME: Bangor Council rejects park smoking ban. Councilors and city staff had previously spent hours in committee crafting and adjusting the ordinance. Originally, the proposal was an outright ban on smoking in all city parks, but after multiple Parks, Recreation and Harbor Committee and Government Operations Committee meetings, it was scaled back to only apply to some parks and then was amended to have Parks and Recreation Director Tracy Willette designate specific areas within parks where people could use tobacco products. Councilor David Nealley argued that the city should not restrict the rights of residents to smoke in parks because smokers pay taxes, too. He and Councilor James Gallant called the ordinance a "nanny clause" and an overreach by the city. MO: Knightyme is latest bar to close since Springfield smoking ban. A supplier of pool tables and juke boxes says 10 bars have closed since Springfieldians banned smoking in them. "I think I realized it maybe six, eight months ago, but I kept hoping and kept putting money in it, and finally I said, 'No more,'" said Knight. He says, since the smoking ban, he's had about a 60-percent drop in business. USA: Citizens for Tobacco Rights helps adult smokers and dippers stay informed about tobacco issues and learn how to become effective legislative advocates. It is supported by Philip Morris USA, U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company and John Middleton. Canada: Peel bans smoking around recreation areas and municipal buildings. Michael Perley, director of the Ontario Campaign for Action on Tobacco, was part of a committee in Peel that had been working on passing the bylaw for two years. The legislation was also designed to reduce opportunities for adults to role model smoking behaviour in front of children, he added. He says next up he'd like to see Peel ban smoking on patios as well. UK: They Got Me Over A Barrel. By J Mark Dodds. About why pubs are closing all over Britain and about how some people are trying to stop it happening. A bit about Camberwell. A bit about me. And a bit about them. and some photographs... World: Smokers Blogs. Watch instant postings to your favorite blogs. |
![]() Watch! Make cigarettes prescription-only drugs? |
Thursday, February 21, 2013
The Property Rights Newsletter February 22, 2013 - Issue #701 "For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains, but to livein a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others." - Nelson Mandela |
![]() The Return of the Professor of Prohibition. "Jim Beam-branded clothing is being sold to children as young as four, in what public health experts have said is one of the most shocking examples of alcohol advertising they have seen." OK, let's just analyse that one sentence and ask ourselves these questions... ![]() **************** NJ: Bankrupt Revel suffers fate of other casinos. From the day it opened last April, Revel insisted it was a different kind of casino. It shunned bus-riding day-trippers, banned smoking... Yet less than a year after it opened, Revel finds it has become like many other Atlantic City casinos: drowning under way too much debt, fighting for a share in a shrinking market and preparing for a date in bankruptcy court with major questions about its future looming large. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() World: Smokers Blogs. Watch instant postings to your favorite blogs. |
1. Choose an industry. 2. Regulate the industry. 3. Tax the industry. 4. Sue the industry. When one source of money dries up, return to Step 1 and repeat. By S. Phillipe |
Thursday, February 14, 2013
The Property Rights Newsletter February 15, 2013 - Issue #700 "Ultimately property rights and personal rights are the same thing."- Calvin Coolidge |
![]() ![]() Oklahoma: Gov. Mary Fallin's support may make difference with smoke-free bill. Gov. Mary Fallin used a piece of her State of the State speech to say she supports letting cities and towns craft their own anti-smoking laws. Legislators often preach the importance of local control in schools and other areas, yet they've been OK with the state dictating cities' and towns' smoke-free policies. Fallin's right: This needs to change. ![]() |
![]() World Smokers Blogs: Watch instant postings to your favorite blogs. |
Thursday, February 07, 2013
The Property Rights Newsletter February 8, 2013 - Issue #699 The Borg are a collection of species that have been turned into cybernetic organisms functioning as drones of the collective or the hive.You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile. Lieutenant Worf: "Kill it now. Make it appear that it died in the crash. Leave no evidence that we were ever here." |
![]() Bursting bubbles is such fun! Long ago, somewhere pre ban I think, it was stated categorically that the smoking ban was merely to protect "the workforce." Of course much of the pre ban workforce is totally unprotected now as approximately 200,000 (UK) jobs have been lost thanks to the closure of thousands of pubs, clubs, Bingo halls etc, therefore those 'workers' that would have been protected are no longer at work and being protected from anything! If anything at all has arisen from their point of view they are even more at risk now they have all the time in the world to roam the polluted streets, inhaling all those beautifully aromatic exhaust fumes. A Tax Reminder: By Leonard Spencer. Exorbitant tobacco taxes are, after all, imposed despite the objections of smokers, and are enforced by a heavily-armed paramilitary police apparatus, and thus, by armed force. Smokers and Obamacare: Penalty could keep smokers out of health overhaul. Millions of smokers could be priced out of health insurance because of tobacco penalties in President Barack Obama's health care law, according to experts who are just now teasing out the potential impact of a little-noted provision in the massive legislation. Insurers won't be allowed to charge more under the overhaul for people who are overweight, or have a health condition like a bad back or a heart that skips beats - but they can charge more if a person smokes. For a 55-year-old smoker, the penalty could reach nearly $4,250 a year. A 60-year-old could wind up paying nearly $5,100 on top of premiums. World: Smokers Blogs. Watch instant postings to your favorite blogs. |
![]() BBC One | Revealing the rich and controversial past of sugar, alcohol, tobacco and opium, Hollywood actor Brian Cox embarks on a thought-provoking journey to uncover how the commercial exploitation of these products hooked the rest of the world on an appetite for a good time. |
Friday, February 01, 2013
The Property Rights Newsletter February 1, 2013 - Issue #698 "Study the past if you would divine the future"- Confucius |
![]() Scammon: By Tom Oyler. It was an idyllic spring morning in Scammon, KS. The little white church on the East side of town shown brightly. The sunlight streaming through its stained glass windows riddled the chapel with a rainbow of colors. The old hardwood pews were polished. The coffin in the vestibule looked magnificent. There was no one in the chapel and no body in the coffin. That was 27 years ago. The day the studies say I died. People blithely accept and believe studies. Not one study in my lifetime has proven to be true, not one. PETITION: Sign to - Prevent the FDA from regulating or banning the sale and use of electronic cigarettes, accessories and associated liquids. The FDA should NOT propose or approve any regulation that would deny cigarette smokers legal or affordable access to less hazardous smokefree alternatives. U.S. experts debate penalties for smokers, the obese. Faced with the high cost of caring for smokers and overeaters, experts say society must grapple with a blunt question: Instead of trying to penalize them and change their ways, why not just let these health sinners die? Critics also contend that tobacco- and calorie-control measures place a disproportionately heavy burden on poor people. That's because they: Smoke more than the rich, and have higher obesity rates. So let's return to the original question: Why provoke a backlash? If 1 in 5 U.S. adults smoke, and 1 in 3 are obese, why not just get off their backs and let them go on with their (probably shortened) lives? MO: St. Joseph Coalition forms to oppose smoking ban. Bob Meeks is spearheading the coalition. It's not the first time he's organized the group to fight the city on different issues, but he said this fight is particularly outrageous. "This is something that really stirred me up the most," he said. "Basically, because if you keep the count that I see overseas, there's been over 60,000 people that have lost their lives and come back in body bags for two words: freedom and choice. I don't think that this council, nor any legislatures, should slap them in the face and say we're going to take your rights away to do business." UK: Freedom2Choose exists to challenge the unfounded assertions of the anti-tobacco industry and its disproportionate influence on government. We campaign within the law against the denormalisation of tobacco users. We also highlight the harm that intrusive lifestyle legislation and policies do to our social, economic, and political life, and to genuine medical and scientific research. World: Smokers Blogs. Watch instant postings to your favorite blogs. |
![]() Have your say at the Club Forum! |